Treatment with soda. Neumyvakin treatment of diabetes - Treatment of diabetes Neumyvakin Ivan Pavlovich diabetes myths and reality

I. P. Neumyvakin

MYTHS AND REALITY

This book is not a textbook on medicine; all recommendations given in it should be used only after agreement with your doctor.

PREFACE

The following circumstance prompted me to write this book. His book “Ways to get rid of diseases. “Hypertension, diabetes” I wrote based on my own experience with an analysis of what has been developed by medicine in various fields, without consulting practically anyone, including endocrinologists.

After the book was published, to make sure that what was written in it was correct, I turned to leading diabetes experts, who, in fact, made no comments on it. At the same time, they noted that the book is topical and truly reflects the state of diabetes in our country and the right direction, which should be the basis for both the prevention and treatment of diabetes. That is why the idea arose to write a separate book about diabetes, especially since this disease is currently taking first place, both in terms of the number of patients and mortality, not to mention the fact that these people are practically excluded from the social sphere of life. Why did I, not a specialist in the field of endocrinology, begin to talk about something that, in my opinion, even specialists do not know? I read somewhere that the process of cognition proceeds in three stages (this was in ancient times). Whoever reaches the first one becomes arrogant, whoever reaches the second one becomes humble, and whoever reaches the third one realizes that he knows nothing. For example, the words of Socrates are well known: “I know that I know nothing.” I don’t know to what extent this is inherent in me, but it is so, because in my medical practice, and in life, I was placed in such conditions that forced me to constantly look for new ways and make decisions, doubting what had been developed in that or other field of science. What led me to this was that when I was doing aviation medicine, someone noticed my constant desire to know more than I needed at this stage. This was probably the reason why I was sent to work in astronautics. At the dawn of the formation of the new discipline, there was a distribution of directions: some began to study water, some nutrition, some psychology, hygiene, but no one agreed to deal with such a problem as providing medical care to astronauts, considering it very difficult. An academician persuaded me to take on this matter. P. I. Egorov, former chief therapist of the Soviet Army, and in the last years of J.V. Stalin’s life, in fact, his personal doctor (by the way, he was arrested in the famous doctors’ case), who headed the Healthy Person Clinic at the Institute of Medical and Biological Problems, and academician A. V. Lebedinsky, assuring that I would mainly be involved in assembling first aid kits for astronauts during flights. Then I was engaged in the analysis of physiological materials coming from spacecraft, and the development of methods for assessing the state of the respiratory system, and indirectly - determining the metabolism of astronauts in flight, which was the subject of my candidate's dissertation, for the completion of which I asked for one month. I soon came to the conclusion that the prospect of space exploration would require not only a set of medicines, but also the creation of a set of measures to provide any type of medical care during space flights, up to the creation of a space hospital (hospital).

Despite being busy, S. P. Korolev found time and attention for a new emerging industry - space medicine. On one of my visits to the clinic to see the academician P. I. Egorov, which was located on the territory of the 6th Clinical Hospital in Shchukino, and the issue was resolved that I would head the direction of work to create means and methods of providing medical care to cosmonauts. Soon, realizing that you won’t fly far on medications alone, already in 1965 I attracted all the out-of-the-box specialists from various fields to this problem and received praise when defending my doctoral dissertation “Principles, methods and means of providing medical care to astronauts during flights of various durations.” , written not based on the totality of work performed, but in the form of a scientific report (which, by the way, was the first in medicine) from an academician O. Gazenko:“In my practice, I have never known such work in terms of its versatility and volume of work performed. Probably, only the forces of gravity and the closed nature of the work did not allow Ivan Pavlovich to attract everyone who he needed to the work he carried out, regardless of where he was.”

Academicians were in my field of activity B. E. Paton(President of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences), B. P. Petrovsky- Minister of Health of the country and his deputy in charge of astronautics, A. I. Burnazyan, A. V. Lebedinsky- physiologist, A. A. Vishnevsky- surgeon, B. Votchal- respiratory pathophysiologist, V. V. Parin- electrophysiologist, L. S. Persianinov- obstetrician-gynecologist, F. I. Komarov- Head of the Medical Service of the Soviet Army, Professor A. I. Kuzmin- traumatologist, K. Trutneva- ophthalmologist, G. M. Iva-shchenko and T. V. Nikitina- dentists, V. V. Perekalin- chemist, R. I. Utyamyshev- radio electronics engineer, L. G. Polevoy- pharmacologist and many others. The versatility of knowledge, the tireless interest in everything new, the originality of thinking of these and many other people involuntarily passed on to me. Plans were drawn up that provided for solutions to particular problems subordinated to the main goal - the creation of a stationary station on spaceships. The special requirements for products supplied to spacecraft required a revision of views on the causation of diseases, their relationship with each other and, most importantly, on the effectiveness of the same type of treatment with chemical drugs, regardless of the nature of the disease. Despite the enormous respect for those with whom I had to work, I could not help but doubt the advisability of fragmenting medicine into narrow-profile approaches, specialized areas, which sooner or later will lead to its collapse. That is why in my, and especially in recent, books for more than 15 years (although I was convinced of this back in 1975), I began to say that there are no specific diseases, but there is a condition of the body that needs to be treated. Of course, it is easiest to criticize the existing foundations of official medicine, which has actually moved away from the postulates laid down by our physiologists about the integrity of the body, in which everything is interconnected and interdependent, but in my books I offer a way out of the current crisis in medicine, talking about the causation of diseases, methods and ways to eliminate them.

Finally, I decided to pay separate attention to such a terrible disease as diabetes, which, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), ranks third in prevalence after cardiovascular diseases and cancer.

Diabetes is one of the oldest diseases of humanity, which has claimed lives for many centuries. According to official data alone, there are 12.2 million people with diabetes in Russia, and according to unofficial data, up to 16 million, and their number increases every 15–20 years. In official medicine there are two names: diabetes And diabetes, in which there are certain differences.

Diabetes implies something pessimistic, a long-term process, accompanied by severe complications, which is considered incurable. Diabetes is also considered an incurable disease, but this is a condition with which the patient can live a full life, following certain rules. The first news about this disease puts a person in a state of shock: why did this happen to me? Fear and depression arise. The patient’s entire life subsequently depends on this reaction: either he will perceive the disease as a challenge to himself, by changing his lifestyle, cope with it, or, showing weakness, a capitulatory character, he will begin to go with the flow.

Why is this disease considered incurable? Yes, because the reasons for its occurrence have not been determined. And this is not surprising, because many experts believe that more than 40 diseases lead to high levels of sugar in the blood, with which this disease is associated, and, according to their classification, there is no such disease as a nosological unit.

Speaking about diabetes, we must not forget that everything in the body is interconnected and interdependent, and the work of the pancreas also depends on such components of the body as nutrition, water supply, breathing, musculoskeletal system, circulatory, lymphatic, and muscular systems. Diabetologists practically don’t talk about this. At the same time, by feeding the cells with a sufficient amount of water (which diabetics always lack), providing them with oxygen and starting the capillary network using a system of physical exercises, you can achieve significant results in the remission of non-insulin-dependent diabetes and significantly make the life of a patient with type 1 diabetes easier. type.

I. P. Neumyvakin

MYTHS AND REALITY

This book is not a textbook on medicine; all recommendations given in it should be used only after agreement with your doctor.

PREFACE

The following circumstance prompted me to write this book. His book “Ways to get rid of diseases. “Hypertension, diabetes” I wrote based on my own experience with an analysis of what has been developed by medicine in various fields, without consulting practically anyone, including endocrinologists.

After the book was published, to make sure that what was written in it was correct, I turned to leading diabetes experts, who, in fact, made no comments on it. At the same time, they noted that the book is topical and truly reflects the state of diabetes in our country and the right direction, which should be the basis for both the prevention and treatment of diabetes. That is why the idea arose to write a separate book about diabetes, especially since this disease is currently taking first place, both in terms of the number of patients and mortality, not to mention the fact that these people are practically excluded from the social sphere of life. Why did I, not a specialist in the field of endocrinology, begin to talk about something that, in my opinion, even specialists do not know? I read somewhere that the process of cognition proceeds in three stages (this was in ancient times). Whoever reaches the first one becomes arrogant, whoever reaches the second one becomes humble, and whoever reaches the third one realizes that he knows nothing. For example, the words of Socrates are well known: “I know that I know nothing.” I don’t know to what extent this is inherent in me, but it is so, because in my medical practice, and in life, I was placed in such conditions that forced me to constantly look for new ways and make decisions, doubting what had been developed in that or other field of science. What led me to this was that when I was doing aviation medicine, someone noticed my constant desire to know more than I needed at this stage. This was probably the reason why I was sent to work in astronautics. At the dawn of the formation of the new discipline, there was a distribution of directions: some began to study water, some nutrition, some psychology, hygiene, but no one agreed to deal with such a problem as providing medical care to astronauts, considering it very difficult. An academician persuaded me to take on this matter. P. I. Egorov, former chief therapist of the Soviet Army, and in the last years of J.V. Stalin’s life, in fact, his personal doctor (by the way, he was arrested in the famous doctors’ case), who headed the Healthy Person Clinic at the Institute of Medical and Biological Problems, and academician A. V. Lebedinsky, assuring that I would mainly be involved in assembling first aid kits for astronauts during flights. Then I was engaged in the analysis of physiological materials coming from spacecraft, and the development of methods for assessing the state of the respiratory system, and indirectly - determining the metabolism of astronauts in flight, which was the subject of my candidate's dissertation, for the completion of which I asked for one month. I soon came to the conclusion that the prospect of space exploration would require not only a set of medicines, but also the creation of a set of measures to provide any type of medical care during space flights, up to the creation of a space hospital (hospital).

Despite being busy, S. P. Korolev found time and attention for a new emerging industry - space medicine. On one of my visits to the clinic to see the academician P. I. Egorov, which was located on the territory of the 6th Clinical Hospital in Shchukino, and the issue was resolved that I would head the direction of work to create means and methods of providing medical care to cosmonauts. Soon, realizing that you won’t fly far on medications alone, already in 1965 I attracted all the out-of-the-box specialists from various fields to this problem and received praise when defending my doctoral dissertation “Principles, methods and means of providing medical care to astronauts during flights of various durations.” , written not based on the totality of work performed, but in the form of a scientific report (which, by the way, was the first in medicine) from an academician O. Gazenko:“In my practice, I have never known such work in terms of its versatility and volume of work performed. Probably, only the forces of gravity and the closed nature of the work did not allow Ivan Pavlovich to attract everyone who he needed to the work he carried out, regardless of where he was.”

Academicians were in my field of activity B. E. Paton(President of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences), B. P. Petrovsky- Minister of Health of the country and his deputy in charge of astronautics, A. I. Burnazyan, A. V. Lebedinsky- physiologist, A. A. Vishnevsky- surgeon, B. Votchal- respiratory pathophysiologist, V. V. Parin- electrophysiologist, L. S. Persianinov- obstetrician-gynecologist, F. I. Komarov- Head of the Medical Service of the Soviet Army, Professor A. I. Kuzmin- traumatologist, K. Trutneva- ophthalmologist, G. M. Iva-shchenko and T. V. Nikitina- dentists, V. V. Perekalin- chemist, R. I. Utyamyshev- radio electronics engineer, L. G. Polevoy- pharmacologist and many others. The versatility of knowledge, the tireless interest in everything new, the originality of thinking of these and many other people involuntarily passed on to me. Plans were drawn up that provided for solutions to particular problems subordinated to the main goal - the creation of a stationary station on spaceships. The special requirements for products supplied to spacecraft required a revision of views on the causation of diseases, their relationship with each other and, most importantly, on the effectiveness of the same type of treatment with chemical drugs, regardless of the nature of the disease. Despite the enormous respect for those with whom I had to work, I could not help but doubt the advisability of fragmenting medicine into narrow-profile approaches, specialized areas, which sooner or later will lead to its collapse. That is why in my, and especially in recent, books for more than 15 years (although I was convinced of this back in 1975), I began to say that there are no specific diseases, but there is a condition of the body that needs to be treated. Of course, it is easiest to criticize the existing foundations of official medicine, which has actually moved away from the postulates laid down by our physiologists about the integrity of the body, in which everything is interconnected and interdependent, but in my books I offer a way out of the current crisis in medicine, talking about the causation of diseases, methods and ways to eliminate them.

I. P. Neumyvakin

MYTHS AND REALITY

This book is not a textbook on medicine; all recommendations given in it should be used only after agreement with your doctor.

PREFACE

The following circumstance prompted me to write this book. His book “Ways to get rid of diseases. “Hypertension, diabetes” I wrote based on my own experience with an analysis of what has been developed by medicine in various fields, without consulting practically anyone, including endocrinologists.

After the book was published, to make sure that what was written in it was correct, I turned to leading diabetes experts, who, in fact, made no comments on it. At the same time, they noted that the book is topical and truly reflects the state of diabetes in our country and the right direction, which should be the basis for both the prevention and treatment of diabetes. That is why the idea arose to write a separate book about diabetes, especially since this disease is currently taking first place, both in terms of the number of patients and mortality, not to mention the fact that these people are practically excluded from the social sphere of life. Why did I, not a specialist in the field of endocrinology, begin to talk about something that, in my opinion, even specialists do not know? I read somewhere that the process of cognition proceeds in three stages (this was in ancient times). Whoever reaches the first one becomes arrogant, whoever reaches the second one becomes humble, and whoever reaches the third one realizes that he knows nothing. For example, the words of Socrates are well known: “I know that I know nothing.” I don’t know to what extent this is inherent in me, but it is so, because in my medical practice, and in life, I was placed in such conditions that forced me to constantly look for new ways and make decisions, doubting what had been developed in that or other field of science. What led me to this was that when I was doing aviation medicine, someone noticed my constant desire to know more than I needed at this stage. This was probably the reason why I was sent to work in astronautics. At the dawn of the formation of the new discipline, there was a distribution of directions: some began to study water, some nutrition, some psychology, hygiene, but no one agreed to deal with such a problem as providing medical care to astronauts, considering it very difficult. An academician persuaded me to take on this matter. P. I. Egorov, former chief therapist of the Soviet Army, and in the last years of J.V. Stalin’s life, in fact, his personal doctor (by the way, he was arrested in the famous doctors’ case), who headed the Healthy Person Clinic at the Institute of Medical and Biological Problems, and academician A. V. Lebedinsky, assuring that I would mainly be involved in assembling first aid kits for astronauts during flights. Then I was engaged in the analysis of physiological materials coming from spacecraft, and the development of methods for assessing the state of the respiratory system, and indirectly - determining the metabolism of astronauts in flight, which was the subject of my candidate's dissertation, for the completion of which I asked for one month. I soon came to the conclusion that the prospect of space exploration would require not only a set of medicines, but also the creation of a set of measures to provide any type of medical care during space flights, up to the creation of a space hospital (hospital).

Despite being busy, S. P. Korolev found time and attention for a new emerging industry - space medicine. On one of my visits to the clinic to see the academician P. I. Egorov, which was located on the territory of the 6th Clinical Hospital in Shchukino, and the issue was resolved that I would head the direction of work to create means and methods of providing medical care to cosmonauts. Soon, realizing that you won’t fly far on medications alone, already in 1965 I attracted all the out-of-the-box specialists from various fields to this problem and received praise when defending my doctoral dissertation “Principles, methods and means of providing medical care to astronauts during flights of various durations.” , written not based on the totality of work performed, but in the form of a scientific report (which, by the way, was the first in medicine) from an academician O. Gazenko:“In my practice, I have never known such work in terms of its versatility and volume of work performed. Probably, only the forces of gravity and the closed nature of the work did not allow Ivan Pavlovich to attract everyone who he needed to the work he carried out, regardless of where he was.”

Academicians were in my field of activity B. E. Paton(President of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences), B. P. Petrovsky- Minister of Health of the country and his deputy in charge of astronautics, A. I. Burnazyan, A. V. Lebedinsky- physiologist, A. A. Vishnevsky- surgeon, B. Votchal- respiratory pathophysiologist, V. V. Parin- electrophysiologist, L. S. Persianinov- obstetrician-gynecologist, F. I. Komarov- Head of the Medical Service of the Soviet Army, Professor A. I. Kuzmin- traumatologist, K. Trutneva- ophthalmologist, G. M. Iva-shchenko and T. V. Nikitina- dentists, V. V. Perekalin- chemist, R. I. Utyamyshev- radio electronics engineer, L. G. Polevoy- pharmacologist and many others. The versatility of knowledge, the tireless interest in everything new, the originality of thinking of these and many other people involuntarily passed on to me. Plans were drawn up that provided for solutions to particular problems subordinated to the main goal - the creation of a stationary station on spaceships. The special requirements for products supplied to spacecraft required a revision of views on the causation of diseases, their relationship with each other and, most importantly, on the effectiveness of the same type of treatment with chemical drugs, regardless of the nature of the disease. Despite the enormous respect for those with whom I had to work, I could not help but doubt the advisability of fragmenting medicine into narrow-profile approaches, specialized areas, which sooner or later will lead to its collapse. That is why in my, and especially in recent, books for more than 15 years (although I was convinced of this back in 1975), I began to say that there are no specific diseases, but there is a condition of the body that needs to be treated. Of course, it is easiest to criticize the existing foundations of official medicine, which has actually moved away from the postulates laid down by our physiologists about the integrity of the body, in which everything is interconnected and interdependent, but in my books I offer a way out of the current crisis in medicine, talking about the causation of diseases, methods and ways to eliminate them.

I. P. Neumyvakin

MYTHS AND REALITY

This book is not a textbook on medicine; all recommendations given in it should be used only after agreement with your doctor.

The following circumstance prompted me to write this book. His book “Ways to get rid of diseases. “Hypertension, diabetes” I wrote based on my own experience with an analysis of what has been developed by medicine in various fields, without consulting practically anyone, including endocrinologists.

After the book was published, to make sure that what was written in it was correct, I turned to leading diabetes experts, who, in fact, made no comments on it. At the same time, they noted that the book is topical and truly reflects the state of diabetes in our country and the right direction, which should be the basis for both the prevention and treatment of diabetes. That is why the idea arose to write a separate book about diabetes, especially since this disease is currently taking first place, both in terms of the number of patients and mortality, not to mention the fact that these people are practically excluded from the social sphere of life. Why did I, not a specialist in the field of endocrinology, begin to talk about something that, in my opinion, even specialists do not know? I read somewhere that the process of cognition proceeds in three stages (this was in ancient times). Whoever reaches the first one becomes arrogant, whoever reaches the second one becomes humble, and whoever reaches the third one realizes that he knows nothing. For example, the words of Socrates are well known: “I know that I know nothing.” I don’t know to what extent this is inherent in me, but it is so, because in my medical practice, and in life, I was placed in such conditions that forced me to constantly look for new ways and make decisions, doubting what had been developed in that or other field of science. What led me to this was that when I was doing aviation medicine, someone noticed my constant desire to know more than I needed at this stage. This was probably the reason why I was sent to work in astronautics. At the dawn of the formation of the new discipline, there was a distribution of directions: some began to study water, some nutrition, some psychology, hygiene, but no one agreed to deal with such a problem as providing medical care to astronauts, considering it very difficult. An academician persuaded me to take on this matter. P. I. Egorov, former chief therapist of the Soviet Army, and in the last years of J.V. Stalin’s life, in fact, his personal doctor (by the way, he was arrested in the famous doctors’ case), who headed the Healthy Person Clinic at the Institute of Medical and Biological Problems, and academician A. V. Lebedinsky, assuring that I would mainly be involved in assembling first aid kits for astronauts during flights. Then I was engaged in the analysis of physiological materials coming from spacecraft, and the development of methods for assessing the state of the respiratory system, and indirectly - determining the metabolism of astronauts in flight, which was the subject of my candidate's dissertation, for the completion of which I asked for one month. I soon came to the conclusion that the prospect of space exploration would require not only a set of medicines, but also the creation of a set of measures to provide any type of medical care during space flights, up to the creation of a space hospital (hospital).

Despite being busy, S. P. Korolev found time and attention for a new emerging industry - space medicine. On one of my visits to the clinic to see the academician P. I. Egorov, which was located on the territory of the 6th Clinical Hospital in Shchukino, and the issue was resolved that I would head the direction of work to create means and methods of providing medical care to cosmonauts. Soon, realizing that you won’t fly far on medications alone, already in 1965 I attracted all the out-of-the-box specialists from various fields to this problem and received praise when defending my doctoral dissertation “Principles, methods and means of providing medical care to astronauts during flights of various durations.” , written not based on the totality of work performed, but in the form of a scientific report (which, by the way, was the first in medicine) from an academician O. Gazenko:“In my practice, I have never known such work in terms of its versatility and volume of work performed. Probably, only the forces of gravity and the closed nature of the work did not allow Ivan Pavlovich to attract everyone who he needed to the work he carried out, regardless of where he was.”

Academicians were in my field of activity B. E. Paton(President of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences), B. P. Petrovsky- Minister of Health of the country and his deputy in charge of astronautics, A. I. Burnazyan, A. V. Lebedinsky- physiologist, A. A. Vishnevsky- surgeon, B. Votchal- respiratory pathophysiologist, V. V. Parin- electrophysiologist, L. S. Persianinov- obstetrician-gynecologist, F. I. Komarov- Head of the Medical Service of the Soviet Army, Professor A. I. Kuzmin- traumatologist, K. Trutneva- ophthalmologist, G. M. Iva-shchenko and T. V. Nikitina- dentists, V. V. Perekalin- chemist, R. I. Utyamyshev- radio electronics engineer, L. G. Polevoy- pharmacologist and many others. The versatility of knowledge, the tireless interest in everything new, the originality of thinking of these and many other people involuntarily passed on to me. Plans were drawn up that provided for solutions to particular problems subordinated to the main goal - the creation of a stationary station on spaceships. The special requirements for products supplied to spacecraft required a revision of views on the causation of diseases, their relationship with each other and, most importantly, on the effectiveness of the same type of treatment with chemical drugs, regardless of the nature of the disease. Despite the enormous respect for those with whom I had to work, I could not help but doubt the advisability of fragmenting medicine into narrow-profile approaches, specialized areas, which sooner or later will lead to its collapse. That is why in my, and especially in recent, books for more than 15 years (although I was convinced of this back in 1975), I began to say that there are no specific diseases, but there is a condition of the body that needs to be treated. Of course, it is easiest to criticize the existing foundations of official medicine, which has actually moved away from the postulates laid down by our physiologists about the integrity of the body, in which everything is interconnected and interdependent, but in my books I offer a way out of the current crisis in medicine, talking about the causation of diseases, methods and ways to eliminate them.

Finally, I decided to pay separate attention to such a terrible disease as diabetes, which, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), ranks third in prevalence after cardiovascular diseases and cancer.

Diabetes is one of the oldest diseases of humanity, which has claimed lives for many centuries. According to official data alone, there are 12.2 million people with diabetes in Russia, and according to unofficial data, up to 16 million, and their number increases every 15–20 years. In official medicine there are two names: diabetes And diabetes, in which there are certain differences.

Diabetes implies something pessimistic, a long-term process, accompanied by severe complications, which is considered incurable. Diabetes is also considered an incurable disease, but this is a condition with which the patient can live a full life, following certain rules. The first news about this disease puts a person in a state of shock: why did this happen to me? Fear and depression arise. The patient’s entire life subsequently depends on this reaction: either he will perceive the disease as a challenge to himself, by changing his lifestyle, cope with it, or, showing weakness, a capitulatory character, he will begin to go with the flow.